and I can't get in touch with anyone from RK who will help me.
Tell them you have $60K in your pocket and want to buy it, they'll contact you with God's speed
and I can't get in touch with anyone from RK who will help me.
This is why I love this forum, because you guys are talking about issues that I've been struggling with. While looking at the eBay car, I too noticed some things that seemed less than accurate. When they talked about the car, they used words like "stock-style" or "period-correct", and don't say that it's original or even what components are original. The RK Motorsports website also has photos of 'documentation', which looks to be photocopies from a reference guide that just shows casting numbers. Someone then took a highlighter and marked all the numbers that correspond with the car, or so it appears. But that's really not helpful at all, anybody can highlight numbers in a book and say, "Yep, this is what it is. That'll be $60,000 please." and some pages even have hand-written corrections. Then, they didn't even bother to provide us with photos of the casting numbers themselves... I found that information to be largely useless, and only added to the confusion.
I agree, the "documentation" they provide is largely about was the police package in 1959 was and what Duntov cars were about, but really almost nothing that establishes their car as one of them. I would imagine that police cars would have a back seat for the obvious reason of prisoner transport.
For the reasons you folks mentioned ,a 2 dr.police vehicle would only be used in intercepter duty.Once the 'perp was stopped,back-up would be called.Trying to transport someone in the back of a 2 dr car would,in my opinion,put the officer in unnecessary jepordy.
One would think a police car would have a back seat, but what about the Interceptors? I find it curious that they would choose a 1221 Biscayne, which shouldn't have a back seat, as a police car when they would have to install a back seat to haul prisoners... Unless the Interceptors were never intended to haul prisoners, but that information is hard to track down. Thanks for offering your speculations, flyboyike, it seems we share similar reservations about that particular car.
Good point, but what if backup is unavailable? Without a back seat, the officer would have to put the prisoner in the front which would place the officer in still more jeopardy.
That's when you just shoot 'em!
That's when you just shoot 'em!
Love it!!!! How can I get this?????
We had 2 door RCMP cop cars until about 1969. Like this one. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9XVW-AXr94
I'm guessing it would be more valuable if it was restored to stock condition but most guys do opt to upgrade a few things.
Disc brakes are nice, maybe an aftermarket sway bar, things like that. An overdrive tranny is also nice but you certainly don't want to bolt a paddle shifter to the steering wheel of a car like that.
It would be cool if you could keep a stock appearance under the hood, and in the interior etc. but I don't see a problem with stroking the 348 or even using a 409.
I think on that car I would avoid things like an MSD box that shows and things like braided stainless steel rad hoses etc. The bling would look wrong on that car.
A stock restored car NEVER goes out of style so I would exercise restraint if it were me.