Hello,
I saw an ad on CL for a 348 that got my gears turning. I'm here to learn about these engines, and want to drop one in my 63 Chevy II eventually. I'll be lurking until I get my project going. My "II" is currently running a 1965 283. Edelbrock Performer intake and a Holley 600cfm. I swapped out the stock cam over the winter for a CompCams XE256. I also swapped out the powerglide for a WCT5. Went with a hydraulic clutch. Just picked up a set of ET slots that will be going on the old girl soon.
Back on topic:
The 409 was the first engine that I could identify as a kid. I remember my Dad took me to Daytona in the early 80's and there was this magenta Impala with a 409. I was so proud that I knew the engine when he picked me up to look under the hood.
I'm not knocking the guys who are doing LSx swaps, but I like old school. Nothing says old school cool like 348/409 valve covers under the hood of a small car.
I saw an ad on CL for a 348 that got my gears turning. I'm here to learn about these engines, and want to drop one in my 63 Chevy II eventually. I'll be lurking until I get my project going. My "II" is currently running a 1965 283. Edelbrock Performer intake and a Holley 600cfm. I swapped out the stock cam over the winter for a CompCams XE256. I also swapped out the powerglide for a WCT5. Went with a hydraulic clutch. Just picked up a set of ET slots that will be going on the old girl soon.
Back on topic:
The 409 was the first engine that I could identify as a kid. I remember my Dad took me to Daytona in the early 80's and there was this magenta Impala with a 409. I was so proud that I knew the engine when he picked me up to look under the hood.
I'm not knocking the guys who are doing LSx swaps, but I like old school. Nothing says old school cool like 348/409 valve covers under the hood of a small car.